Hey there,
it would be nice to have an advanced search syntax, where I am able to group different options together.
For example:
(#tag1 #tag2 #tag3) -is:completed
This would translate to āfilter with all 3 tags and only show non-completedā.
At the moment this looks like this:
#Tag1 -is:completed OR #Tag2 -is:completed OR ...
Thanks!
~Philipp
Yes. Need this functionality desperately. Iāve seen it requested before in this post. I wonder why it hasnāt been incorporated, yet.
Hear! Hear!
It doesnāt take all that much complexity in a desired search before having to duplicate elements across multiple āORā sections starts making the search very (very) long and way more difficult to read / understand.
I understand there are issues/concerns about searching for actual text/content that includes brackets (as has been noted in one or two other old threads where this topic has come up tangentially) - but it must be possible to find something sufficiently rare in place of just normal parentheses to use for ābracketsā in search that the risk of it being a problem to search for it is miniscule in comparison to the benefits from having shorter and more readable (and perhaps even more powerful) searches.
My personal suggestion would be ā{{ ā¦ }}ā, or if you think people might use double-curly-braces often enough perhaps go with an extreme set of mixed braces such as ā{<[ ā¦ ]>}ā !!
(PS: I realise this is a somewhat old thread to resurrect, but I couldnāt find a more recent one and wanted to show itās a long-standing concern rather than simply start a brand new topic)