For those not using Scrivener, it’s a writing software with a powerful compile feature.
Because Dynalist isn’t a novel writing software it doesn’t have a corkboard but because it has the right sidebar, it simulates the initial view of Scrivener’s binder already.
What’s missing is selective exporting/copy paste aka compiling. In Scrivener’s compile feature, you can export an exclusive set of documents and combine them together so much so that even the naming conventions can be tweaked by folder name or by document name.
With Dynalist’s viewed as article feature combined with its bullet structure - this makes it easier to put comments and footnotes in Dynalist than it does in Scrivener. If only Dynalist can hide certain bullets and exempt it from being exported.
It can already export to visible items only, it would be nice to see the feature made even more powerful by having an article view exclusively set to eliminating/hiding multiple bullet points.
Scrivener also has scrivenings which basically means being able to combine the contents of two documents into one view. It would at least be convenient to be able to combine two documents together easily.
Hmm…maybe I’m overthinking this but the lack of reply may mean I haven’t described the functionality well so here’s a long youtube video about the feature.
why don’t you just show what you’re talking about instead?
It’s tough to show scrivenings. Imagine two documents that would merge into one view if you click on the parent folder instead of the documents but the two documents don’t actually merge. This makes it convenient to preview how two documents would look if they were to merge into one.
what’s wrong with scrivener?
I didn’t realize the feature section requires there to be something wrong with Scrivener for it to apply to Dynalist but anyways Scrivener does not do bullets well and it doesn’t have a zooming feature.
It’s clunky though in that it requires an extra pane to hide and show notes so I’m typing my impressions (or footnotes/notes/synopsis in Scrivener lingo) out in Dynalist and selectively exporting/copying what I type out and then removing the bullets one by one once I paste it in either Scrivener (which I tried) or Sigil (which I haven’t tried yet)
So, to give context where I’m coming from: Evernote. Evernote has taught me the rule that you’re better off working with the current feature set of a program (although in Evernote’s case that was harder as they removed so many features)
From that angle – [quote=“Paul_Keith, post:1, topic:542”]
If only Dynalist can hide certain bullets and exempt it from being exported.
[/quote]
Work with “complete” (CTRL + ENTER). In OPML you can do a search and replace, in rich text you have a visual to remember “hey, lets remove this”
That said, @Erica, I love the simplicity of this implementation:
As for…
I love writing in Dynalist but use it on the bullet level. I can drag bullets around easily and move them in and out of the document at will. This way I have (some) of the capabilities of Scrivener w/o having to wait for other features, some of which may not be useful for a larger customer base.
Very well communicated, @Paul_Keith, and there is indeed no need whatsoever for the program from which you draw inspiration for a feature request to be clunky, defect, or defunct in any way. Excellent feature request.
