Sorry, I donāt know how to reproduce it, but it keeps happening.
I have items with hundreds of items, and I donāt look at them every day since I use the āmoveā command to send things to them. But thereās this bug where I lose everything and I donāt notice for days, then I have to go back in version history, since the moment it occured, and reconstruct things. I lose data in the process because I donāt know exactly how to splice things back exactly. Anyway, hereās the only evidence, sequential version history items . Maybe someone knows the cause?
Version 5:00pm, good
item1
ā¦hundreds of items
Version 5:01pm, What? Why did hundreds of items move down one item when I created Item2?
item1
item2
ā¦hundreds of items
Version 5:02pm, when I deleted Item2 here, having no idea it contained all my data
item1
NOTHING
Version 5:03 - several days pass before I notice these data losses.
Anyone else get this problem?
My only theory is its something like this:
or maybe something involving backspace
When an items splits, I wish the children stay with the first character of the item, thatās the oldest, the anchor, the little trailing new thoughts shouldnt be able to kidnap them when they split off, that doesnt make any sense to me, what scenario would that be desired? Seems dangerous.
Do you have āUnindent items in-placeā turn on in your settings? It ākindā sound like you create a list, and unindent item in the middle of the list with that option on. For my own experience with daily use that I never encounter this situation, and I donāt have that option turn on.
Iām so glad you were able to find most of the data from version history!
Need a bit of explanation here: in the āitem1/item2/hundreds of itemsā example, was āitem2ā typed in by hand or sent from somewhere else with the Move to feature?
It was the sort of thing Iād hand type and delete soon after. I also do unindent and then indent in order to shiffle items to the bottom of lists, but I donāt think that could cause this. It was probably my fault for not noticing. I kind of wish there was a mode that items with children canāt be deleted. I think it was the fact that if you split an item, even just the last word of the item, the children follow that word, even though itās a new thing. Im usually just trying to break a subitem out when I split an item with enter. Trips me up. Version history is very useful, I forgot it existed until I needed it.