Roam Research, new web-based outliner that supports transclusion & wiki features - thoughts?

If this is done, could we make it like #(Tag with Spaces) or #[Tag with Spaces]? I dislike #Tag with Spaces#

A planner like this has a limitation that roam (in my opinion) has a better solution for.

For example, in a list like this, where do your projects live? They either need a dedicated home, where you need a system for recording what you did that day that exists both in the project home and in the date calendar, or they live somewhere forever associated with a specific date. You can use tags to call up your projects but what if you want a clean look at all of them for high-level prioritization? Moving things around from this view isn’t easy either.

The benefit of roam is that a page can live in multiple places at the same time. So in my outline of today’s notes I can have a node that says I did x y and z on #project-A and that reference can live in my calendar. The big difference is that if I then click on the #project-A tag, rather than doing a search for those tags, #project-A is its own full page, where I can see everything related to #proejct-A in one place – both the main outline I’ve created as well as any other places in my system that I’ve linked to it (including today’s calendar reference). Because tags ARE pages, it would be like if Dynalist made tags their own note links.

Now, you might not need or want this, and that’s totally fine, but the answer to the question of if this is easily implementable with Dynalist is a definite no (at least in terms of what users are able to do). A Dynalist node has a permanent location because it’s a hierarchy. Roam is flat, and pages exist anywhere and everywhere I want them at the same time.

1 Like

Interesting, may I ask why? #[tag with spaces] is one more character to type. Is it because it’s easier to see what’s between the brackets?

ha, I read this article and I immediately bought Nat’s course on how to use Roam. I’m deep into the rabbit hole.

Using parenthesis is just more consistent with other [markup](markdown)

The ease of creating new notes require no two note to have the same title, no? That was the biggest deal-breaker I mentioned in the post I pointed you to. In the current set up of Dynalist, [[non-existent page name]] will create a new document under root and you can’t have two with the same name. Roam will merge pages with the same name.

Definitely, we extensively test out all the new competitors. In addition to being interested new tools like you guys, this is also market research work! I want to reassure you that we never intend to dismiss them as merely new tools.

1 Like

@Alan, the funny thing is that I prefer #tag with spaces#! :sweat_smile:

1 Like

That was my thought too, because it seems more consistent with the tag system right now.

#[tag with spaces] makes it a little confusing (“is it a tag or a link?”).

1 Like

There are solutions to this. For example when you type [[ currently dynalist shows a search box. Maybe the first option could be “create item” and after you choose it and hit enter the search box becomes a name input box. Then when you type and hit enter again that item is created and the markdown text becomes [item name just entered](dynalist url of new item). It is just a UX adjustment to keep you in the flow and allow you to create new items and reference them immediately.

To make it even quicker, after typing [[ you could just type the name of new item, and then maybe hit Ctrl-Enter and Dynalist would know that you want to create a new item with whatever typed.

I could flesh this out even more (I’m a software developer too so UI/UX design is also part of my job), but what I’m trying to say is that some of these things aren’t necessarily that big of a change to what is already in Dynalist, and they will give a lot of power to it and in the future could even prevent people from even trying Roam cause Dynalist can already do most of it.

The back-references you’re adding is already a big part of that and that’s great!

3 Likes

Thank you for the clarification! Yes projects would need their dedicated place somewhere in the hierarchy. Maybe bookmarked or linked for quick access.

I initially thought Roam is something similar to Dynalist but now I understand it’s something completely different.

My personal opinion is, that if the user thinks trough his hierarchy and makes up a good system it takes next to nothing to put in everything at the right place. But admit that this is strongly depending on personal preference.

Good real life example of one of many workflows that Roam allows https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvWic15iXjk

I always wanted to have multiple dynalist docs in one window, with d&d between them. In powerpack that was achieved partially with iframes, but it took more RAM and time to load than it should, and d&d was not possible. That alone would open much more possibilities, I wonder why no one mentions this, right sidebar is one of the most useful things in Roam and it’s totally possible to recreate it in Dynalist. If I were the owner of Dynalist, creating components for embedding docs (and queries/search results) within docs, and docs in second column, would be my first thing to do.

Obviously it’s for people who uses such things to manage their life in digital format in more sophisticated ways than writing todo/groceries lists and simple notes. Probably tiny minority of users, so it might be not worth the time.

4 Likes

I see very little in the video that is about the unique organizational system of Roam. Just parallel viewing of two documents. What I would like is to be able to pull an element of a document in by reference and view that inline.

  • Subject
    • borrowed text linked [cloned] in place
      • also borrowed
    • my comments here on what i cited.

It was literally what he was doing there entire video, using references from other docs all the time. One can use embeds instead of references too, to make that “cloned” stuff editable in place, when needed.
Each time he drags something and green “+” icon appears, it creates reference to the stuff he is dragging. (by alt+drag on mac / ctrl+drag on win)

1 Like

Yes, I completely agree that it comes down to preference.

For me, I very much enjoy the fact that in Roam my projects don’t need a dedicated space (at least not a single one).

Personally, I’ve just never been fully comfortable with my permanent hierarchies in Dynalist, and I’ve tried several different systems. I’ll be the first to admit that this type of organization isn’t my strong suit, so it’s possible that the shortcoming is my own rather than with the tool. But that’s the nice thing about a plurality of tools – we can find the one that compensates for the things we don’t do well.

I’m slowly easing into Roam, but a lot of dominoes would still have to fall before I could even consider leaving Dynalist. For now it’s a fun thing to explore.

2 Likes

Strange. It looked more like cut right paste left.

This is possible in roam, it’s called a reference block! The downside of using them is that they are not editable in their cloned location (though you can tick the box if it’s a to-do as well as expand and collapse the outline).

A question while exploring Roam Research some more:

It looks like [[ is used to refer to a “page” and (( is used to refer to a “block” (similar to an “item” in Dynalist), did I understand correctly?

So although you can freely create pages, to refer to them you’ll at least remember if it’s a page or a bullet point under a page, is that right?

Maybe you saw some cut and paste, but entire video is to show how one can outline article with references from other sources. It’s hard to see that on video due to it’s quality, but almost everything there was underlined and with slightly smaller font, this is how references are styled.

One can also use {{embed: ((blockId))}} to make them editable.

Yes.

Any example when page could be confused with block? I have 500+ docs there and never found this to be a problem.
In case you would be confused, and for some reason you don’t want to use [[ or search-box to check if something has page, using (( also shows you that, because results are listed in markdown, pages are between [[...]]. When you’re looking for meditation with (( and you write ((medi and see e.g. I want to start practicing [[Meditation]] you know you have also page about that.

Yes, and the easy shortcut to that is to type / then choose Block Embed. Then you will get a search box for blocks. Block Embeds can also have their children expanded, but you need to use the keyboard shortcut to expand it.

1 Like

+1 for sidebar and drag and drop
+1 for embed iframes