Yeah option 1 is pretty much pure WYSIWYG. I think the advantage is that nothing ever gets āun-renderedā, so no surprised there. The downside is of course having to click on LaTeX equations makes the feature less useful. LaTeX is supposed to be portable like Markdown.
Offering WYSIWYG as an option would please me no end, while leaving the option for Markdown for those who appreciate it would satisfy all of us. Iām finding the display of Markdown on the selected item to be distracting and inconvenientā¦
I enjoy WYSIWYG but would like the editor to retain some markdown-ish features. The option to type [[ and you can start to search for a note to link to is an awesome feature here. Would hate to lose that to āunderline the word you want to link, press CTRL + Kā
I fully support a WYSIWYG option. The way Typora does it seems to be a great best-of-both-worlds solution.
Pretty much the only issue Iāve come across happens while using the mouse to select some text and a keyboard shortcut to bold it. Itās incredibly frustrating to have to relocate the word I was targeting for every single instance.
In an attempt to find a solution, I wrote a userscript that shows the raw text on hover, instead of only on focus. It helps a bit by saving one click, but the problem still remains. Hopefully somebody can find some value from it .
Nice script!
Consider using the classList
interface rather than manipulating the string.
(Mind removing the console logs? )
1000% support this ā ~ ** { Making Life Better } ** ~
- most appropriate time is now
donāt support the āpopup menuā that medium and dropbox paper does
-
this clutters up the screen, more than it needs to be
-
the key thing is that these shortcuts are basic, everyone knows ctrl b ctrl i ctrl k (everyone has used a word doc)
if they donāt,
- the much much larger problem is even finding out about dyna
i only found out about it from quora and only because i was curious
i tried googling around for reviews and stuff and there was like nothing
How should it be different than Dropbox/Medium/Telegra.ph/Boldās editors?
Before Dynalist, I had never heard of (or remembered) Ctrl+k (but wish I had). And currently it doesnāt work.
Thatās a different topic, which you could make a post about if you havenāt already, and share your thoughts on how to spread the word about it. The Dynalist team has done its part in making a reddit ad, Quora posts (I found it from there, too, via Google), etc.
I guess the people who would otherwise review Dynalist live inside it since itās very useful and versatile, so we never hear about it. But I try to promote it wherever possible.
I also strongly believe the best solution is to integrate both. I canāt imagine it would be too difficult to make both work in different modes that can be switched in the options menu. WYSIWYG could be the default option for the majority, and those who use markdown can find the option to turn it on as it is right now. I also really like ā[[ā links.
Coming back to this quote from @Ericaās opening post:
the question is when is the most appropriate time to do it
I think the answer to that is: ASAP.
- Quite a number of people donāt like the double editor concept; a good number are even annoyed. So making the change makes the product more accessible and desirable to (new) users
- if the change has to come, now is better than later. Alienates less people & gets it done.
And if itās somehow easy to rollback, then itās worth experimenting with.
Iāve added a poll to the OP.
Mentioned before, but if you can give Dynalist the visual style+function of Bear http://www.bear-writer.com then youāve made it.
We donāt like showing the Markdown, honestly. It makes the formatted text look bad (itās like HTML tags still showing in your webpage).
Anyone else feel the same way?
The difficulty is mainly with Markdownās spec (or rather, lack of spec), rather than the technical aspect of it. Compared to markup languages like XML, Markdown is very loose. For example, it doesnāt tell you how to handle nesting and overlapping. It doesnāt tell you about how to extend it either, thatās why there are so many flavors of Markdown out there.
Of course, the strength of Markdown lies in that it can merge formatting with plain text in a readable way. Itās flexible and quick, but not that strict and rigorous. Converting anything between WYSIWYG (actually HTML or XML under the hood) and Markdown freelyā¦ that sounds like a nightmare. Iāve actually never seen any system that does that. Would really love to see some real world examples.
Typora
They seem to have solved the WYSIWYG and markdown problem in a very nice way. Also their support for equations and math is really good. Second only to more technical tools as Lyx.
Iāve tried Typora, but I donāt think it fells under the traditional WYSIWYG category. When you press Ctrl+B, it basically just inserts asterisks for you, rather than applying the format directly. With a WYSIWIG editor like Google Docs, youāll almost never seen the ācodeā thatās responsible for the formatting. You just see it.
I believe @Matt_Groth was talking about a way to switch between WYSIWYG mode and Markdown mode, which is kind of different from what Typora does.
That being said, if Typora were to open source their editor someday, it would be an improvement over what we have right now.
Wow, I had no idea. Sorry about being so presumptuous!
Np, I had no idea befor either, that was just the conclusion from lengthy discussions among ourselves on the actual implementation.
I agree, users should have the choice to choose whatever option works the best for them. Generally speaking, I have used a WYSIWYG and Markdown editor, and have incurred less formatting errors with Markdown when moving text from one format to another. But thatās more of a personal preference than anything else.
Iād also like to point out that always expanding text to markdown gets in the way when I am just moving items around and not editing.
I pretty much exclusively move items up and down using my arrow keys and tab and use the move-to shortcut instead of mouse dragging. Having to always expand each item can be slightly frustrating when some of my items contain several large URLs, and it feels unnecessary since in some contexts I move items around more than I edit them.
Not to rush you ā¦ I know how much you must have on your plates with the mobile releases!